In class we spoke about Voluntary Export Restrictions (VERs)
in relation with rent seeking and efficiency losses. This article evaluates
the effects of Voluntary Export Restriction (VER) on Japanese cars that was in
place from 1981-1994. In these years between 1.68 million and 2.30 million
Japanese cars were allowed into the US. This caused the prices of Japanese cars
sold in the US to average about $1,200 (or 14%) higher than what they would
have been. This resulted in increased
car sales and profits of U.S. firms by about $2 billion per year. However, US
consumers suffered because of higher prices and the entire US economy suffered
welfare losses of about $3 billion.
VERs are often put in place instead of import tariffs (which
would result in government revenue) for political considerations; VERs give the
exporting government power (and potential revenue) over the exports instead of
the other way around. However, in this case the negative impact on Japanese car
sales was completely offset the profit-enhancing effects of higher prices. Japan
was no better and no worse off than before the VER. However, had a tariff been
implemented, Japan would have lost money.
Welfare loss doesn’t only result from foregone foreign
production, but also because import restrictions result in the inefficient use
of domestic resources. The article mentions that many Japanese manufacturers
set up shop in the US to not be restricted by the VER. The cars could have been
produced more efficiently in Japan, so while it might have been contributed
positively to the US economy, for the world economy as a whole this caused a
loss.
No comments:
Post a Comment