The anti-tax pledge, produced by conservative activist
Grover Norquist and his lobbying firm Americans for Tax Reform, requires
signers to vote against tax increases. It also means they cannot support
eliminating loopholes and deductions without creating a tax cut that would
balance the effect on revenue. Many Republicans argue this pledge is in the
economic interest of voters, but it also has a strong ideological basis. This
pledge is an appeal to voters who believe in reducing spending, lower taxes,
and a smaller government.
However, Republicans recognize the restraints of the pledge or
an inflexible position on tax increases will make it nearly impossible to reach
a compromise on reducing the deficit and avoiding the fiscal cliff. A compromise that avoids the cliff is in the
economic interest of the entire country. Last June in an interview, Sen. Lindsey Graham nicely summed up the problem
facing signers when he voiced his opposition to it. He says, “"We
are so far in debt that if you don't give up some ideological ground, the
country sinks". This growing shift in the
Republican position reflects the problem Kalt and Zupan observed with voting
based on ideology. Some Republicans suspect if they cannot reach a compromise to avoid
the fiscal cliff because of this “no new taxes” stance, they will be accused of
shirking their responsibilities to their constituents and the nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment