In class, we discussed how industries actually benefit from government regulations, because the
regulations can serves as barriers to entry, allowing firms to charge a
higher price and obtain a larger profit.
We also looked at two common examples of regulated industries, sugar and
corn.
In the article, “Cattle Now Being Fed Cookies and Candies Instead of Real Food,” Anthony Gucciardi
shows real effects that market regulations can have on society. Gucciardi states that “livestock corporations have now begun feeding their
cattle super cheap processed foods like cookies, gummy worms, chocolate, fruit loops
and a whole list of candies.”
As we discussed in
class, sugar prices in the US are twice as much as the world sugar price, due
to regulations in the sugar market such as import tariffs, buy-back programs,
and many other regulations. However,
even more recently, the corn market is becoming more and more regulated, driving
up the price of corn as well. In addition,
there has been increased use of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) or “fake
corn” in order to lower the cost of corn production. Even after studies have shown that
consumption of GMOs actually kills livestock, 88% of the corn produced in the
United States is a GMO. However, since the
corn market is regulated, firms in the corn industry are able to produce fake
corn at a very cheap price, and sell it at a high price. Many farmers are no longer able to afford to
feed their cattle using (fake) corn at this highly regulated price, and
therefore have an incentive to turn to other feeding means, including a diet of
candy and sugar. Even with the regulated
sugar industry, the cost of using corn for feed is still greater than the cost
of using sugar. By consuming meat that was
fed on a diet of not only GMOs but sugar and candy, humans will have to
deal with the consequences and deterioration of our health.
In
conclusion, when the government is deciding on industry regulations, they
should take the welfare of society into consideration, not just a
single industry that is lobbying for the economic rent. As Gucciardi states “many such individuals
are purely looking to increase profits, utilizing ‘anything’ that keeps costs
down regardless of the price.”
No comments:
Post a Comment