In his article
“Public Policies, Pressure Groups, and Dead Weight Costs,” Gary Becker argues
that interest groups do not dominate policies and that there is no reason to be
wary of them. However, a study
conducted from 1981 to 2002 on 1,779 issues found that interest groups can
have a major influence on public policy. The evidence found that business-centered
groups and economic elites had the greatest impact, compared to ordinary
citizens and groups that try to appeal to the masses. The power the interest
groups have, as Olson says, comes from “their characteristic and primary function,” which “is
to advance the common interests of groups of individuals.”
Becker demonstrated that
interest groups are not a cause for concern because they enact more pressure
against inefficient policies than pressure for them. The research by Gilens and
Page supports this claim: “A proposed policy change with low support among
economically elite Americans is adopted only about 18% of the time, while a
proposed change with high support is adopted about 45% of the time. When
mass-based and business-oriented interest groups oppose a policy, the
probability of its being enacted is only 16%, rising to 47% when they’re
strongly favorable.” As Becker argued, these groups will fight against policies
that will result in a deadweight loss.
No comments:
Post a Comment