My high school had over 3,000 students. Sports were a huge
part of our high school culture. My field hockey team only had about 25
members. With so few teammate, you had to give your all in practice or you ran
the risk of coach turning practice into the sprinting scene from Miracle.
The small size of the team allowed us to overcome the free rider problem,
making us a more effective group. Our practices were tough, but truly prepared
us for our games and this lead us to States.
Many of the girls on field hockey would run track in the off
season to stay in shape. Our track team had almost 100 people on it, and it was
most athletes’ secondary sport. On this team, the free riding problem was
rampant. With 100 athletes and only 3 coaches, there was no way for the coaches
or even the captains to ensure each teammate fully participated. Many times, on
our “fun run” days, there would inevitably be kids who would hide around the
corner away from the coaches’ view while the rest of the team ran. They would wait
for everyone to come back, and then fall in line as if they had ran the whole
thing! The large size of the team encouraged the free rider problem.
Additionally, there were no selective incentives. Track tends to be an
individualistic endeavor. An individual, not the whole team, qualifies for States.
So it was difficult to get individuals who were not as heavily invested in
track to pay in to the common goals of the team. Who knew high school track
teams could be examples of latent groups!
No comments:
Post a Comment