This summer, I worked for the Office
of Economic Research in the Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy.
Whenever other federal agencies create a new regulation, they have to (by law)
take the effect on small business into account, and the Office of Advocacy
represents those interests in Washington. Coming from a small town brimming
with small businesses, I thought my work to promote smart, small-business
friendly regulations was noble--that is, until Mr. Coppock’s lecture on
rent-seeking a few weeks ago. The Office of Advocacy works to promote
regulations that benefit small businesses. In some ways, this is an example of
rent-seeking. Rent-seeking is when resources are spent to obtain rents which
derive from socially wasteful activities.
This summer, the FCC considered
a petition from US Telecom to change a 1996 regulation concerning copper wires.
I won’t get into the details here, but we can say that big firms wanted the
regulation to change and small firms wanted the regulation to stay the same. At
one particular meeting, we had 12 different representatives from 12 different
small telecommunications companies present. I imagine that each of those
companies flew those representatives out from across the country, put them up
in hotels, paid for their meals, etc. On the other side, US Telecom
commissioned a study to investigate the effects of the regulation change. I’m
sure this study cost thousands of dollars. In short, all the companies involved
in this issue spent money that did not create any value. After all those
socially wasteful activities, the FCC decided not to change the rule after all.
In the future, I hope the Office of Advocacy will focus on creating a healthy,
competitive environment, one into which small businesses can freely enter.
These kinds of regulations, rather than ones which merely transfer rents from
one group to another, will optimize social welfare.
No comments:
Post a Comment