When it comes to making group decisions, my
friends and I are the worst, especially when deciding where to eat. I kid-you-not
when I say that my friends and I have argued for over TWO hours trying to
decide what pizza restaurant to order food from. These group decisions are costly
in time and effort because everyone has different
preferences and dietary restrictions; however, these decisions are made as
a group because there is a higher cost imposed on the individual when deciding
where to eat on his own because the individual forgoes the community aspect of
eating together. The decision-making costs of this scenario between my friends
and I are extremely high because we struggle immensely to get people to come to
an agreement on where to eat, and the external costs are high to each
individual because many of us are stubborn and hold strong food preferences
that drive up the cost of each individual not agreeing with the decision made
by the group. Usually, we decide on where to eat by a majority rules basis, but
according to Buchanan and Tullock, my friends and I suffer from an insufficient
allocation of resources because we don’t operate at the cost minimizing threshold.
No comments:
Post a Comment