In September 2013, the Boston mayoral race included about a
dozen candidates once Mayor Thomas M. Menino announced he would not
seek a sixth term. An article in
the New York Times describes how Cara and Michael McGrath, a Boston couple,
struggled to differentiate between the candidates. Ultimately, education was their top priority because of
their children. Mr. Connolly, a
former public school teacher and candidate for the mayoral office, stood out
from the pack for the McGrath’s because of his stance on education. However, many other voters had
difficulty deciding which candidate they wanted to support.
Massachusetts is a deep blue state whose
candidates have overlapping platforms and shared constituents. For example, so many of the candidates
are supporters of gay rights. The reason for the similarities in candidate
platforms can be described by the median voter theorem. It predicts that the candidate who gets
the vote of the median voter will win because there are just as many voters
politically to the left of that voter as there are to the right. This gives the candidate an incentive
to move closer to the opponent’s platform in a two party system in order to
gain more votes. The result is that
candidates both attempt to appeal to the median voter; this makes their
platforms look very similar. When
this occurs, it is difficult for voters to distinguish between candidates.
No comments:
Post a Comment