EB-5 visa is an employment based fifth preference visa, better
known as the investor visa. Eligible immigrants can become permanent lawful
residents, and eventually citizens, upon investing $1 million in a US business
that employs at least 10 American workers. In FY2016, China, Vietnam and South
Korea comprised the three largest nationality categories for EB-5s. The most popular settlement states were CA, NJ, NY and PA. Taken
in the most extreme case, EB-5 visas may represent a modern day Tiebout
preference revelation for the wealthy.
Tiebout’s model of local expenditures attempts to solve the
problem of preference revelation. He argues that consumer voters move to the
localities that best match their preferences towards the optimal bundle of
public goods. Could the same idea be applied to investor visas? It may
sound like a stretch, but these visas provide a vehicle for the extension of
market principles into public goods provision. Immigrants essentially “purchase”
permanent residency, and in doing so "shop" around in pursuit of the optimal
public goods provision. The state that they move to from their home country represents that which provides the most desired bundle of public goods. Of course in this case, moving is not costless. However, if we
ignore this violation of Tiebout’s assumption – the basic model could still
apply. So strong is the desire of these investors to move to a locale with a more desirable provision of public goods, that their expression of preferences is unmistakable and expensive.
No comments:
Post a Comment