In a surprising move, Popeye’s
Louisiana Chicken recently added a chicken sandwich to their menu. To try it, I
recently went to the Popeye’s on Emmet St. with a few friends and we were greeted with a
long line of cars. After finally getting through the line, we were politely
told that they were all out of the sandwiches and wouldn’t have any more until
the following week. We of course left, because fried chicken without a brioche
bun just wasn’t going to cut it. As we left, we again made our way through the
thick traffic going in and out of Popeye’s. My friend mentioned how the new sandwich
must have increased the demand for Popeye’s. After getting home, a quick
Google search showed that our experience was not unique.
Along with the
expected increase in demand for Popeye’s, there has been a significant increase in traffic around their locations: a negative consumption externality. While we
initially assumed this was included in the cost borne by consumers, further
research found that some people have no interest in Popeye’s chicken sandwiches
and even more striking, some people don’t even like friend chicken. Thus, the increase
in traffic means the social marginal benefit curve is less than the consumer
marginal benefit curve. There is no Coasian solution to this, because the large
majority of these roads are public roads and have no enforceable property
rights. A possible solution would be a government tax or regulation on these
chicken sandwiches to lower demand to the optimal level. This measure would account for the total value of these sandwiches to society and the cost
of the traffic. However, to know
this, we would need to do a lot more research on the exact statistics and more
importantly, we need to taste the sandwich (when its back in stock).
No comments:
Post a Comment