In class, we discussed a study examining the relationship
between the outcomes of football games within one week of the presidential
election and the outcome of the presidential election itself. The study
determined that when a football team wins, its fans/people in the surrounding
area are generally happier. If this is the case, this group of people is more
likely to vote for the incumbent out of feelings of satisfaction.
In light of this study, I began to
think about other events that could potentially swing the election one way or
another. One of the major events that consumed the minds of people living on or
near the East Cost this past week was Hurricane Sandy. This article
hypothesizes about the effect of Hurricane Sandy on the outcome of the presidential
election. According to the article, “political
scientists have found that extreme weather affects how voters evaluate
presidents and governors, and botching disaster response can dash incumbents'
reelection hopes.” Thus, the way in which President Obama responds to the
hurricane can affect people’s satisfaction with the current President as a
leader. In fact, a study showed that voters punish leaders for failing to react
adequately to natural disasters, while rewarding those who respond effectively.
Thus, with all of the damage that came with Hurricane Sandy also came an opportunity
for President Obama to secure some votes, assuming appropriate crisis management, before Election Day on Tuesday.
No comments:
Post a Comment