After being notified by the secretary of state that the raffle might be a violation of state law, it has been opened to nonvoters as well, but the idea behind it fits neatly within our discussion of the costs and benefits of voting for individuals. By offering voters a chance at winning a firearm, the store's owner hopes to incentivize voting by increasing the potential returns to casting a ballot. However, using Johnson's methodology and accounting for the realistic probability of winning the raffle, the payoff is probably too low to affect most citizens' decision of whether to vote or abstain on Tuesday.
No comments:
Post a Comment